okikuma
Member
Morning Jim,Good morning Wayne,
We seem to be coming down on the opposite sides in this discussion.
I think JR's post indicates that low tech devices can serve a purpose. Even though radar is much improved from the 1940's, It is still possible to spoof it. LIDAR could possibly be less easily fooled in some environments, but acoustic detection seems to still be relevant.
Jim
I agree that low tech is still very relevant. The Viet Cong taught us a great lesson in that respect. When I said, "...the PLA will use a very decisive, diversified, multi-asset, combat operational approach to quickly overwhelm and overrun Western ground combat forces." This will be an overwhelming combination of low to high tech weaponry including the Hunting Eagle strike gyroplanes.
Can the Hunting Eagle strike gyroplane be detected by using simple big listening horns (acoustic mirrors) or "big ears?" Absolutely. As I mentioned previously, the Chinese are very clever. If their enemy is using acoustical detection, they'll just defeat it with a swarm of very loud drones as a diversion.
Here's an interesting website on Aircraft detection before radar, 1917-1940
Aircraft detection before radar, 1917-1940 - Rare Historical Photos
Acoustic location was used from mid-WW1 to the early years of WW2 for the passive detection of aircraft by picking up the noise of the engines.
rarehistoricalphotos.com
Robert,I imagine the thump of the rotor would be quite easy to detect, even before it's audible to humans!
I don't 'know' sound, but coming in at say 10-20' AGL isn't sound dissipated quickly? A fixed parabolic 'ear' may not hear it until it's incredibly too late. especially if these 'ears' are pointed to a spot way beyond where these craft would be launched.
I wonder how many they could pack into, say, a container ship with a makeshift runway just off the coast of a Country that freely allows Chinese container ships to dock...
Point the ship into the wind.. kick it up to 10-12 kts... and release the 'hive'.
That first wave could catch everybody off guard.
You're not far off with the idea of PRC using disguised container ships as combat ship launching platforms for tactical and strategic rockets and missiles, VTOL aircraft, drones, and gyroplanes just to name several. What we think they possibly can do, they already have done so.
For years, PRC has embedded thousands of Ministry of State Security (MSS) agents here in the USA, so they know more about our capabilities than we do about theirs. There are more MSS agents in Los Angeles than FBI agents. A statement directly from the FBI.
Wayne