What I can't understand, after the 9/11 attack, why did the US, supposingly with sh#thot intel, go after Saddam? Saddam had diddly squat to do with it! Saddam had no Al-Qaeda connection. Saddam is a shi'ite, Bin-Laden a Sunni, they won't sit around the same table. Everybody new the baddies were Al-Qaeda, as well as where they were, again, why was Saddam the evil dude of 9/11? after the first Gulf war, surely the US should have known Al-Qaeda has nothing to do with Saddam in Iraq.
Why don't you guy's comment on the story of the Kuwaiti girl Nayirah that claimed she saw the atrocaties in Kuwait, the interview that swung the US public and gov opinion to launch the first Gulf war. The whole thing was a PR stunt, how about you guys comment on how the US managed to be fleeced by a PR company!! To me, that's when things started going down the wrong track in the world.
Why don't you check up that the guy's sponsoring the 9/11 terrorists were being supported from the UAE. The leader, Mohammed Attar, was leading the public department of Sh Sultan bin Khalifa, the son of the current ruler of the UAE, Sh Khalifa. The meeting place in the UK, where all the intel reports said they met and planned things, is still owned by the same son of the ruler of the UAE. One of the terrorists was an officer in the UAE military. Yet today, the UAE is the biggest muslim ally of the US in the Middle East. The bases of Saudi and Bahrain are being replaced with UAE bases. The biggest airbase for USE use in the UAE, Safran, has about the whole US military on it. Yet, no-one thinks they are bad, but the 9/11 terrorists were supported from there.
How does all that fit into the picture, why is it only Iraq that was bad ??