Thank you Juergen. I don't doubt that a "normal housewife" (I was close) was able to fly the Fl282. Propaganda is not always lies. Very plausible to lift off, fly around the airfield slowly and land. Just a truthful testament to the stability of a syncropter.
Years ago I was told by a friend that new Charlie Kaman that Charlie was able to inspect and study one of the captured FL282 at the end of the war. Charlie knew that the marriage of his servo tab rotor control on the blades of a syncropter were made for each other. The main reason why Charlie left Sikorsky started his own company and hired Anton Flettner to work with him at Kaman.
Here's what I posted on this forum about 10 years ago about Syncropters in reference to stability.
It is often said that those who don't learn from history, often repeats the same. It is also said that a good idea is often repeated.
By design, the Syncropter is a very stable helicopter, especially in hover. The Syncropter is the only helicopter whereas the pilot can safely release his hand off the cyclic for a good period of time, and the helicopter will not try to deviate from an upright stationary position and ultimately crash.
The US Navy and USMC have been recently experimenting with pilot-less rotorcraft, mainly with the Kaman K-1200 K-MAX Syncropter for battlefield and ship resupply. Well, back in 1953 the US Navy and Kaman Helicopter Company experimented with the same idea.
The first link is a segment from the old TV show, "You Asked For it"
The next video is the current development and experimentation of pilot-less rotorcraft for battlefield and ship resupply.
History repeats itself or a good idea repeated?
Wayne