Mike G
Junior Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2005
- Messages
- 1,989
- Location
- Lillebonne France
- Aircraft
- Owned Magni M16 now ELA 07
- Total Flight Time
- 550FW + 500 gyro
In post #32 of this thread :
https://www.rotaryforum.com/threads/rotor-vibrations.1145740/
I wrote about a simple accelerometer with a USB port that could be linked to a smartphone to allow vibration measurements to be made simply and cheaply and recorded via an app. I proposed to analyse the results for owners so that I would be able to build a database for each gyro model and be able to tell an owner if his vibrations were good, bad or ugly. There was very little reaction from members here on the RWF but there was more interest on FaceBook, so we’ve progressed a bit with this idea and here's an update.
We’ve made a different version of the case to allow it to be easily bolted to the mounting bracket and made a simplified mounting bracket for the Calidus/Cavalon, which I sent to Jeff Harrison to try out on his Calidus. Here is a photo of the accelerometer mounted on another Calidus I used for testing in France.
Jeff had to struggled a bit because this is all new and prototype stuff. My idea was that he took some screenshots of the spectra for me to look at while flying at different airspeeds, but he found that awkward and used an interesting app that allowed him to record a video screenshot. This meant he could start the app before TO and stop it on landing which was a safer solution than messing about trying to take screenshots while flying.
Here’s an edited video of his rotor vibrations.
From these I could tell him that his horizontal 1/rev vibrations were between 0,4 and 0,6 IPS and that his 2/rev vibrations were between 1.7 and 3.0 IPS which are fairly low 2/rev values compared to other 2 seat eurotubs. His vertical vibrations were quite low suggesting that his tracking was probably reasonable.
The interesting question (and the reason I’m trying to develop this device) is, of course, does this rotor require track and balance (RTB)? When the 1/rev vibrations are around 0,5 IPS it’s always a bit difficult to decide whether to RTB or not, If I got these results with a balancer attached to the gyro I’d say let’s do it because I’ve already traveled to the site and the balancer is already installed. Using this new device I’d be tempted to say leave it alone.
So I advised Jeff that this rotor would benefit from an RTB because, properly done, the vibrations should all be below 0,1 IPS and if a dynamic balancer and competent operator were available locally go for it. If however it meant considerable expense bringing in someone from a great distance with travel expenses etc then it’s probably not worth while because he won’t feel a great difference between 0,5 and 0,1 IPS.
Jeff is in the process of sending this prototype to Florida where we hope another guinea pig tester will try it out on his Cavalon and feedback the results and any suggestions for improvements.
Mike G
https://www.rotaryforum.com/threads/rotor-vibrations.1145740/
I wrote about a simple accelerometer with a USB port that could be linked to a smartphone to allow vibration measurements to be made simply and cheaply and recorded via an app. I proposed to analyse the results for owners so that I would be able to build a database for each gyro model and be able to tell an owner if his vibrations were good, bad or ugly. There was very little reaction from members here on the RWF but there was more interest on FaceBook, so we’ve progressed a bit with this idea and here's an update.
We’ve made a different version of the case to allow it to be easily bolted to the mounting bracket and made a simplified mounting bracket for the Calidus/Cavalon, which I sent to Jeff Harrison to try out on his Calidus. Here is a photo of the accelerometer mounted on another Calidus I used for testing in France.
Jeff had to struggled a bit because this is all new and prototype stuff. My idea was that he took some screenshots of the spectra for me to look at while flying at different airspeeds, but he found that awkward and used an interesting app that allowed him to record a video screenshot. This meant he could start the app before TO and stop it on landing which was a safer solution than messing about trying to take screenshots while flying.
Here’s an edited video of his rotor vibrations.
From these I could tell him that his horizontal 1/rev vibrations were between 0,4 and 0,6 IPS and that his 2/rev vibrations were between 1.7 and 3.0 IPS which are fairly low 2/rev values compared to other 2 seat eurotubs. His vertical vibrations were quite low suggesting that his tracking was probably reasonable.
The interesting question (and the reason I’m trying to develop this device) is, of course, does this rotor require track and balance (RTB)? When the 1/rev vibrations are around 0,5 IPS it’s always a bit difficult to decide whether to RTB or not, If I got these results with a balancer attached to the gyro I’d say let’s do it because I’ve already traveled to the site and the balancer is already installed. Using this new device I’d be tempted to say leave it alone.
So I advised Jeff that this rotor would benefit from an RTB because, properly done, the vibrations should all be below 0,1 IPS and if a dynamic balancer and competent operator were available locally go for it. If however it meant considerable expense bringing in someone from a great distance with travel expenses etc then it’s probably not worth while because he won’t feel a great difference between 0,5 and 0,1 IPS.
Jeff is in the process of sending this prototype to Florida where we hope another guinea pig tester will try it out on his Cavalon and feedback the results and any suggestions for improvements.
Mike G