I did not want to continue in this pointless educational discussion since most people do not want to be educated.... but .... since i have seen my name and products been mentioned and challenged i need to make one more comment!!!!. i will try and keep it as simple as possible.
It is against my personal interest to try and show to other gyroplane manufacturers how they can improve there products.... but when it comes down to try and save at least a single life then i put aside my personal interests.
Abid, you are referring to negative G's ( the G i have mentioned i tried my gyroplane at as well as the G's experienced by the pilot in WAG) as being -2 maybe -5 G's. I believe that even the WAG accident was not much lower than 0 G. You said you can arrange for us to see the WAG video... please arrange so we can all be educated.
Facts:
-0.01 G is a negative G!!! so.. we do not need to go to -2 G to be able to talk about - G's.
torque over, push over, even drag over by the big low positioned cabins (even at idle engine RPM) can occur from +0.3 G.... and surely at +0.1 to 0 G. any negative G will also add other effects on the frame and rotor.
this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWNKvAyKcFc
shows a pure guy that just lulled sharply up... see the slow motion part at the end... you can see that he only moved the stick an inch forward... also the Mac engine it was not that high thrust but it started pushing him over.. and then ..although the Mac does not have a lot of torque it rolls him over... even full stick deflection did not to the left did not save him.. you can see it in slow motion.
you are strongly advocating that putting the HS or fin so it will works against the engine torque is not needed for a safe design...... it is like saying OK.. if you have safety belts in your car is as safe as it can get because they will protect you when you crash at reasonable speeds...... But... if you crash at 150 MPH you are going to kill your self.... so.. no need to have air bags installed.
we do not say that the features we are promoting on our designs are 100% pilot proof.... we just say that we give them all the protection they can get....
I was going to respect it if you were saying that you do not believe the extra safety provided by a on HS in the propwash worth the aesthetic loss.... but you are just saying that all we are trying to share with everybody is figment of our imaginations!!!
Now... on the subject of your chalange to show you how aviomania behaves at 0 or - G.....
the reason i did not show the tests i did back in 2009 is so that pilots will not try them just because i tested them and survived. The reason i tested them was not for certification purpoces.... it was for me to have my consies clear that i am offering to my customers the best protection posible.... so.. i can realy say to them ... If you make a small mistake the gyroplane will not bite you... but will give you the chance tp correct your mistake.
you see.... i do not want to say to them.... do not make a mistake!!!
your idea of showing what Aiomania gyros behave like at reduced or - G it will prove a nice selling point... so i might do it when i have the time... but......
since you challenged me...... what do you say we make it simple??? i show you some reduced G manoeuvres (simple ones) and you duplicate them with your gyroplane.... at the same altitude as i will be doing them (below 100 feet)?