PW_Plack
Active Member
I've been thinking a lot lately about gyro-gliders and their potential to be an economical entry into the sport. Most towed trainers are not really gliders, but must be continuously powered by a tow vehicle, and lack functional rudders which would be needed for safe free flight and landing.
I'm thinking about gliders which could be released, flown for a while, and landed.
There are established ratings and standards for the operation of gliders, but the ratings and endorsements require instruction in soaring techniques. I know the rule of thumb for a Bensen-like gyro is a glide ratio of about 4:1, which can be bettered somewhat with improved aerodynamics. I've also seen the video of the foot-launched gyro-glider on YouTube.
Questions:
Could a gyro-glider be cleaned up enough aerodynamically to soar in anything short of a cumulonimbus updraft?
I've had personal friends who got into lift unintentionally, and reported 2,000 FPM or more in uncommanded climbs. In every case, it happened under cumulus clouds, which if not escaped could be serious trouble. But what about terrain features which produce ridge lift? Could an unpowered gyro have the capability to stay out of trouble, or would it take constant, expert attention to keep it off the rocks?
If a gyro-glider could be launched near a reliable source of lift, could it be capable of sustained soaring flight for long periods?
If the launch zone was too far from the source of lift, would it be practical to launch a gyro-glider with a fixed-wing tow plane and get it close enough to catch the lift?
If this could be made to work, it might be possible to enjoy flying on a greatly reduced budget, and the minimums for instruction for a glider add-on to a powered certificate are as little as three hours.
I'm thinking about gliders which could be released, flown for a while, and landed.
There are established ratings and standards for the operation of gliders, but the ratings and endorsements require instruction in soaring techniques. I know the rule of thumb for a Bensen-like gyro is a glide ratio of about 4:1, which can be bettered somewhat with improved aerodynamics. I've also seen the video of the foot-launched gyro-glider on YouTube.
Questions:
Could a gyro-glider be cleaned up enough aerodynamically to soar in anything short of a cumulonimbus updraft?
I've had personal friends who got into lift unintentionally, and reported 2,000 FPM or more in uncommanded climbs. In every case, it happened under cumulus clouds, which if not escaped could be serious trouble. But what about terrain features which produce ridge lift? Could an unpowered gyro have the capability to stay out of trouble, or would it take constant, expert attention to keep it off the rocks?
If a gyro-glider could be launched near a reliable source of lift, could it be capable of sustained soaring flight for long periods?
If the launch zone was too far from the source of lift, would it be practical to launch a gyro-glider with a fixed-wing tow plane and get it close enough to catch the lift?
If this could be made to work, it might be possible to enjoy flying on a greatly reduced budget, and the minimums for instruction for a glider add-on to a powered certificate are as little as three hours.