Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arrow-Copter for Mission from Madison, WI to NYC

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Vance.....I would pick you as an example to follow for getting the max out of life...You sir are collecting rocking chair memories , and that has been my mode of operation for years.
    I am immersed in stair projects that I I wish would never end, so as long as I am healthy, I am creating as many rocking chair memories as I can.
    Curved stairway builder


    Enjoy life...consider eternity.


    www.stansstairways.com

    Comment


    • #17
      Thank you Stan! I love you and miss you my friend.
      Regards, Vance Breese Gyroplane CFI http://www.breeseaircraft.com/

      Comment


      • #18
        Helicopters more efficient? Are you kidding? The Robinson R-22 is one of the most efficient helicopters since it uses a piston engine and it burns 9.5 gph to cruise at 96 knots indicated (10 mpg in statute miles). My gyro burns 5 gph to cruise at 80-85 knots indicated (16-17 mpg).

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by EdResnick View Post
          Helicopters more efficient? Are you kidding? The Robinson R-22 is one of the most efficient helicopters since it uses a piston engine and it burns 9.5 gph to cruise at 96 knots indicated (10 mpg in statute miles). My gyro burns 5 gph to cruise at 80-85 knots indicated (16-17 mpg).
          At $310,000 new basic configuration price point

          Comment


          • #20
            Thanks everyone for the insight!

            Comment


            • #21
              Chuck, you old sneaky-Pete, you trying to start a rukus in the ranks here? Discussions have been a little stale of late. Heh heh
              Regards

              Frank

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by C. Beaty View Post
                Whatever lights your fire, Vance. Some get their kicks by jumping out of an airplane without a parachute, some by climbing mountains, others by going over Niagara in a barrel.
                Ouch !!
                As a mountaineer, I find the lumping together of those three activities rather rude. There is no particular skill, physical training, problems to be solved along the way, or series of challenges to be overcome to be mere cargo in a falling barrel. Climbing mountains, like flying, requires technical and decision-making skills, and is all about managing risks, not blithely ignoring them. Both climbing and flying are weather-sensitive activities that require careful planning to be completed safely. With the addition of physical conditioning not needed by pilots, climbing can get you higher with human power alone than most general aviation aircraft dare tread. I've been well over 20,000 feet above sea level while standing on terra firma, without supplemental oxygen, and there is great satisfaction in reaching a summit through personal effort and dedication. I've also lost more friends to aviation accidents than to climbing accidents. I'd feel far safer on a typical climbing day than I would skimming trees in Mac-powered Bensen.


                Comment


                • #23

                  I dare say that crossing Niagara on a tight wire requires more physical skill than mountain climbing but itís challenge Iíll gladly forgo.

                  BTW: the first time I landed my Bensen with the Mac still running was a new and frightening experience.
                  Last edited by C. Beaty; 03-04-2018, 10:10 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    How do you be at 20k feet without suffering from extreme hypoxia or worse?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      You train for it patiently in stages, and the body adapts, with increased hematocrit and other physiological changes, but it takes time and effort..
                      A sea-level based sedentary smoker who was suddenly taken to 20k would pass out, but somebody with healthy heart and lungs who has gone through the trouble to acclimatize can still function up there (one will find tasks more strenuous and difficult than at sea level, but still possible). I climb very, very slowly at those heights. I plan to climb Ama Dablam (see below) in the Himalayas this October, and will spend nearly a month in Nepal to do so, as I adjust slowly (and I will sleep in an altitude tent for several weeks before I leave California to get a head start). Here's a little bit I stole from Wikipedia that may be informative:

                      Altitude acclimatization is the process of adjusting to decreasing oxygen levels at higher elevations, in order to avoid altitude sickness.[14] Once above approximately 3,000 metres (10,000 ft) Ė a pressure of 70 kilopascals (0.69 atm) Ė most climbers and high-altitude trekkers take the "climb-high, sleep-low" approach. For high-altitude climbers, a typical acclimatization regimen might be to stay a few days at a base camp, climb up to a higher camp (slowly), and then return to base camp. A subsequent climb to the higher camp then includes an overnight stay. This process is then repeated a few times, each time extending the time spent at higher altitudes to let the body adjust to the oxygen level there, a process that involves the production of additional red blood cells.[15] Once the climber has acclimatized to a given altitude, the process is repeated with camps placed at progressively higher elevations. The rule of thumb is to ascend no more than 300 m (1,000 ft) per day to sleep. That is, one can climb from 3,000 m (9,800 ft) (70 kPa or 0.69 atm) to 4,500 m (15,000 ft) (58 kPa or 0.57 atm) in one day, but one should then descend back to 3,300 m (10,800 ft) (67.5 kPa or 0.666 atm) to sleep. This process cannot safely be rushed, and this is why climbers need to spend days (or even weeks at times) acclimatizing before attempting to climb a high peak. Simulated altitude equipment such as altitude tents provide hypoxic (reduced oxygen) air, and are designed to allow partial pre-acclimation to high altitude, reducing the total time required on the mountain itself.

                      Here's Ama Dablam, with the summit at 22,349 feet:
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Ama_Dablam2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	463.0 KB
ID:	1131070
                      Last edited by WaspAir; 03-05-2018, 05:03 PM. Reason: adding picture

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I learned from you post Jon, thanks for sharing.
                        Sound like a great adventure, hope you share the story with some pictures.
                        Resistance is futile…… You will be compiled!
                        Cheers,
                        John Rountree

                        PRA- Director, Secretary
                        PRA- Business Manager

                        PRA31 - Vice President of S.D. Rotorcraft Club
                        http://www.Pra31.org

                        U.S. Agent for Aviomania Aircraft... the most stable gyroplane on the market today.
                        See: Aviomania USA http://www.AviomaniaUSA.com

                        OEM Dealer for MGL Avionics - glass cockpit EFIS for Experimental aircraft Ask about DISCOUNTS for PRA MEMBERS

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Interesting about the altitude acclimatization. Thanks for posting. One sport I wouldnít be able to do. Sounds painful too.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            My only experience with high altitudes was from having visited Mexico City a number of years ago. Itís at 7,000 ft and I couldnít find a hotel with a working elevator.

                            For this flatlander, climbing 5 or 6 flights of stairs at that altitude was more than enough of a challenge.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X