Rotary Wing Forum  

Go Back   Rotary Wing Forum > Rotorcraft > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-18-2012, 11:47 PM
autogyro's Avatar
autogyro autogyro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: china
Posts: 285
Default engine on head?

Hi everybody
Is it a good or bad idea that install engine over head, at the top of mast?
It can make gyro more short, and easy get CLT,right?

Edward

Last edited by autogyro; 07-18-2012 at 11:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-19-2012, 09:07 AM
rwaltman rwaltman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hewitt, NJ, USA
Posts: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by autogyro View Post
Is it a good or bad idea that install engine over head, at the top of mast?
Terribly bad idea. Will increase the risk of power pushovers.
Search for power pushover accidents.

Roberto.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-19-2012, 09:17 AM
Master Roda's Avatar
Master Roda Master Roda is offline
Gyro Jedi
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Scappoose.OR USA
Posts: 3,111
Default

Maybe he means an engine for prerotation?
__________________
President of PRA Chapter 73
PRA# 42165
Sport Copter's Website
Sport Copter's Facebook
http://www.pra73.net
PRA73 Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2012, 11:42 AM
Rehan K.Janjua's Avatar
Rehan K.Janjua Rehan K.Janjua is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rawalpindi-Pakistan
Posts: 1,436
Default

I would say BAD.

Cause of prop on engine, thrust line center.

NO NO can not even imagine the design or the location.
Short coupled gyro are not very stable.

Or can have engine and prop up front of rotor and tails on the rear of
the rotor. Again many no nos.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2012, 11:49 AM
WHY WHY is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: miami,oklahoma
Posts: 4,282
Default

Master Roda

I think your point is correct on what he is asking.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2012, 11:52 AM
WHY WHY is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: miami,oklahoma
Posts: 4,282
Default

Remember one of the old Bensen pre-rotors with the little O&R 2 stroke on the head ??

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-19-2012, 01:05 PM
Early Bird Dave's Avatar
Early Bird Dave Early Bird Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St Augustine, Fl.
Posts: 382
Default

Several are flying if he means pre-rotator motors on mast.
Super Mike Hughes...chime in!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-19-2012, 01:13 PM
phantom phantom is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eagle River
Posts: 605
Default engine on head

I built a gyro with a 60 hp outboard engine on the top of the mast and it had the lower unit/gearcase as a redrive and it worked fine in flight but was top heavy on the ground.

Norm
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-19-2012, 06:09 PM
autogyro's Avatar
autogyro autogyro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: china
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phantom View Post
I built a gyro with a 60 hp outboard engine on the top of the mast and it had the lower unit/gearcase as a redrive and it worked fine in flight but was top heavy on the ground.

Norm
Thanks for above reply.

Hi Norm
do you have images?
do you think it is better or bad than conventional gyro?

Edward
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-21-2012, 07:17 PM
PW_Plack's Avatar
PW_Plack PW_Plack is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Murray, Utah, USA
Posts: 6,585
Default

Edward, if you're talking about 60 HP, this is obviously not a prerotator, but the main powerplant. You may be misunderstanding "CLT." You don't achieve it by putting that much mass that high. A thrust line far below the center of gravity has its own set of issues.

Putting a large mass up at the very top also brings issues for blades, hub bars and rotorheads. Most simple gyroplanes depend on flexing of the mast to de-tune the fore-aft vibrations that occure twice per revolution of the rotor. If an engine is mounted where its inertia will resist the freedom of the mast to flex, you'd have to plan another way to accommodate that movement, such as a slider head, or risk cracking other parts.

Maneuverability also calls for getting the major masses as close together as possible to preserve a low moment of inertia. If you hold a pole horizontal with a 10 kG weight at the center, you'll be able to turn and change the direction you're facing fairly easily. Use two 5 kG weights at the tips instead of 10 in the middle, and turning it will take much longer for a given force. The same effect limits some of the maneuvers typically flown by gyro pilots.

Radical departures from the norm can sometimes be progress, but this may not be one of those times!
__________________
Paul W. Plack
Sec'y, UT Rotorcraft Assoc.
Editor, Western Rotorcraft

Last edited by PW_Plack; 07-21-2012 at 07:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-21-2012, 07:38 PM
Ronnie328 Ronnie328 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Austin
Posts: 195
Default

i don't know about how it would effect maneuvers, but i think being top heavy on the ground would make it more trouble than it's worth. I don't have a gyro, but i'm sure i'd be pretty upset if i accidentally tipped mine over...
__________________
Keep your head in the clouds.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-22-2012, 04:54 AM
Brent_Brown's Avatar
Brent_Brown Brent_Brown is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Linden, NC
Posts: 3,267
Default

motorhead.....
__________________
Brent Brown
brentbrown@caci.com
ezgb@earthlink.net
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-23-2012, 01:58 AM
autogyro's Avatar
autogyro autogyro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: china
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PW_Plack View Post
Edward, if you're talking about 60 HP, this is obviously not a prerotator, but the main powerplant. You may be misunderstanding "CLT." You don't achieve it by putting that much mass that high. A thrust line far below the center of gravity has its own set of issues.

Putting a large mass up at the very top also brings issues for blades, hub bars and rotorheads. Most simple gyroplanes depend on flexing of the mast to de-tune the fore-aft vibrations that occure twice per revolution of the rotor. If an engine is mounted where its inertia will resist the freedom of the mast to flex, you'd have to plan another way to accommodate that movement, such as a slider head, or risk cracking other parts.

Maneuverability also calls for getting the major masses as close together as possible to preserve a low moment of inertia. If you hold a pole horizontal with a 10 kG weight at the center, you'll be able to turn and change the direction you're facing fairly easily. Use two 5 kG weights at the tips instead of 10 in the middle, and turning it will take much longer for a given force. The same effect limits some of the maneuvers typically flown by gyro pilots.

Radical departures from the norm can sometimes be progress, but this may not be one of those times!
Thank you Paul, thank for eveybody who answered me !
I get more clear about it from your explain.
Edward
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger